<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Lounge - Medical & Pharma]]></title>
		<link>https://lounge.forum/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Lounge - https://lounge.forum]]></description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[New best candidate to cure cancer]]></title>
			<link>https://lounge.forum/showthread.php?tid=63</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 07:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://lounge.forum/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Sapere</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lounge.forum/showthread.php?tid=63</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[If you haven't heard yet, new potential cure for cancer has been discovered by a Japanese lab. <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/07/260709160655.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...160655.htm</a><br />
<br />
By using bacteria from "Ewingella americana" frog it causes what sounds like, biological chaos (for cancer).<br />
<br />
The bacteria thrives inside low oxygen area such as a tumor, and multiplies 3000x within 24hrs destroying the cancer and getting the attention of the immune system to take out the leftovers.<br />
<br />
The bacteria did not seem to be interested in any of healthy organs (in mice).<br />
<br />
Within 72 hrs the there was mild inflammation, but otherwise non-life threatening.<br />
<br />
The bacteria's half-life is 1.2hrs at which point it gets flushed out. It only survives for few hrs, meaning that it doesn't stay inside organism for long at all. Just long enough to show your immune system that it found something that you shouldn't have and will stay there until it's gone.<br />
<br />
They haven't done human trials yet, but sounds better than shooting up chemicals to poison entire body just to have a 50/50 chance in 6 months.<br />
<br />
Apparently this potential treatment completely eradicates 100% of cancer cells, what seems to be in record time.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately curing a deadly disease in 3 days is not as profitable as 6 months to 5 years of treatment. So no pharma company will jump to get something like that rolled out.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://lounge.forum/images/attachtypes/pdf.png" title="Adobe Acrobat PDF" border="0" alt=".pdf" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=8" target="_blank" title="">This frog bacterium.pdf</a> (Size: 118.4 KB / Downloads: 0)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you haven't heard yet, new potential cure for cancer has been discovered by a Japanese lab. <a href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/07/260709160655.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...160655.htm</a><br />
<br />
By using bacteria from "Ewingella americana" frog it causes what sounds like, biological chaos (for cancer).<br />
<br />
The bacteria thrives inside low oxygen area such as a tumor, and multiplies 3000x within 24hrs destroying the cancer and getting the attention of the immune system to take out the leftovers.<br />
<br />
The bacteria did not seem to be interested in any of healthy organs (in mice).<br />
<br />
Within 72 hrs the there was mild inflammation, but otherwise non-life threatening.<br />
<br />
The bacteria's half-life is 1.2hrs at which point it gets flushed out. It only survives for few hrs, meaning that it doesn't stay inside organism for long at all. Just long enough to show your immune system that it found something that you shouldn't have and will stay there until it's gone.<br />
<br />
They haven't done human trials yet, but sounds better than shooting up chemicals to poison entire body just to have a 50/50 chance in 6 months.<br />
<br />
Apparently this potential treatment completely eradicates 100% of cancer cells, what seems to be in record time.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately curing a deadly disease in 3 days is not as profitable as 6 months to 5 years of treatment. So no pharma company will jump to get something like that rolled out.<br /><!-- start: postbit_attachments_attachment -->
<br /><!-- start: attachment_icon -->
<img src="https://lounge.forum/images/attachtypes/pdf.png" title="Adobe Acrobat PDF" border="0" alt=".pdf" />
<!-- end: attachment_icon -->&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="attachment.php?aid=8" target="_blank" title="">This frog bacterium.pdf</a> (Size: 118.4 KB / Downloads: 0)
<!-- end: postbit_attachments_attachment -->]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Angelina Jolie effect" is mental]]></title>
			<link>https://lounge.forum/showthread.php?tid=62</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://lounge.forum/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Sapere</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lounge.forum/showthread.php?tid=62</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Women have their own side of "media". We're split into genders, then by categories that include variations of interests. <br />
<br />
Some social media influences our perception, and that influences what we do.<br />
<br />
Long story short, when a celebrity removes her breasts and fallopian tubes because of possibility of cancer due to a gene during a test, maybe just keeping tabs on health with checkups is a sane option. <br />
<br />
Statistically, such operations "doubled" - i.e in the same clinic by 400 annual operations (total around 800).<br />
<br />
But as a celebrity, they probably know the basic psychology of the fans - some things will be repeated by them.<br />
<br />
I don't understand willing self-mutilation for preemptive reasons. Never mind conscious decisions just for physical alteration.<br />
<br />
Although Angelina's "diagnosis" was in 2013, it's still crazy to think how people are influenced to change themselves physically because of their idols.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Women have their own side of "media". We're split into genders, then by categories that include variations of interests. <br />
<br />
Some social media influences our perception, and that influences what we do.<br />
<br />
Long story short, when a celebrity removes her breasts and fallopian tubes because of possibility of cancer due to a gene during a test, maybe just keeping tabs on health with checkups is a sane option. <br />
<br />
Statistically, such operations "doubled" - i.e in the same clinic by 400 annual operations (total around 800).<br />
<br />
But as a celebrity, they probably know the basic psychology of the fans - some things will be repeated by them.<br />
<br />
I don't understand willing self-mutilation for preemptive reasons. Never mind conscious decisions just for physical alteration.<br />
<br />
Although Angelina's "diagnosis" was in 2013, it's still crazy to think how people are influenced to change themselves physically because of their idols.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gatekeeping health]]></title>
			<link>https://lounge.forum/showthread.php?tid=46</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://lounge.forum/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Sapere</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://lounge.forum/showthread.php?tid=46</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Thinking on what to make the first post here, but little comes to mind because breakthroughs that are announced are rarely made public or fail to make considerable change if it cannot sell 10000% of it's value.<br />
<ul class="mycode_list"><li>mRNA vaccines - they promise the world, if they don't clot you up. Taken too lightly on what it is. It literally circumvents body functions to demand body reaction.<br />
</li>
<li>cancer vaccines - now that few countries came out making progress, they will be competing who says they can do more. Final product coming right after fusion reactors.<br />
</li>
<li>off topic related: fusion reactors - energy plant research started in 1932, scientists still say "coming soon, in about 30 years" for the last 90 years.<br />
</li>
<li>tooth enamel regeneration - in human trials, TBA 2027<br />
</li>
<li>something about reversing aging - very likely all companies bought out 100 times and got handed new NDA's<br />
</li>
</ul>
<br />
What's cooking in other bat labs - everything that we don't want probably.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thinking on what to make the first post here, but little comes to mind because breakthroughs that are announced are rarely made public or fail to make considerable change if it cannot sell 10000% of it's value.<br />
<ul class="mycode_list"><li>mRNA vaccines - they promise the world, if they don't clot you up. Taken too lightly on what it is. It literally circumvents body functions to demand body reaction.<br />
</li>
<li>cancer vaccines - now that few countries came out making progress, they will be competing who says they can do more. Final product coming right after fusion reactors.<br />
</li>
<li>off topic related: fusion reactors - energy plant research started in 1932, scientists still say "coming soon, in about 30 years" for the last 90 years.<br />
</li>
<li>tooth enamel regeneration - in human trials, TBA 2027<br />
</li>
<li>something about reversing aging - very likely all companies bought out 100 times and got handed new NDA's<br />
</li>
</ul>
<br />
What's cooking in other bat labs - everything that we don't want probably.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>